5/15/2003

■ 關於「廢除僑委會」

0 comments

(2003 TAA-Chicago Newsletter的投書)

大家好!

我是在 U of Chicago 的博士後研究員潘潤生。

看到 Gene 寄出的「廢除僑務委員會」的附件,我感到有點悲傷:海外臺灣人為什麼到現在還在用「古老的方式」打「現在的戰爭」?

「僑務委員會」固然是 KMT 時代的產物,但是,一個機構可以有「階段性」的角色。以前台獨人士是根本不可能去接近這個組織,但是現在情況不同,我們有機會可以透過「參與」的方式去接收這個組織的龐大資源。

但是,海外臺灣人到現在還沒看清楚這個大好的機會,還在用以前的觀念在體制外打游擊戰。

試想:「僑務委員會」是那樣一個大餅,那些分享到權益的人,有可能自斷飯碗嗎?我們在公司工作、上班,如果有人說要投票決定是不是要把你 fire 掉,你有可能去投票贊成他嗎?

再來:看看阿扁的對待統派的軟弱做為,你們難道還真的相信他會在任內把「僑務委員會」砍掉嗎?在我看來簡直是痴人說夢。

在這樣「主觀、客觀條件都不可能」的情況下,我們還在心理上極端地排斥這個組織,唯一的下場,就是「放棄我們的參與權,讓這個組織繼續往統派偏過去」。我們有機會去接收它而不去接收它,反而把時間精神浪費在「不可能達成」的任務上。這樣下去,難道我們自己不必為「僑委會在繼續收買統派人心」負責嗎?

事實很明顯:我們不去接收它,它只好繼續聘用那些統派,不但讓這個組織的「統派色彩」更嚴重更難廢除,還讓他們有機會繼續利用「僑委會」的資源去收買人心。

你們的目標是在「廢除僑務委員會」,但是你們的做法,卻是「讓它有機會更向統派團結」「有機會繼續收買人心」,造成「敵長我消」的下場。這種「實際做法與目標剛好相反」的行為,難道不是很荒謬嗎?

我們應該做的,是鼓勵、支持更多的海外臺灣人加入僑委會,讓僑委會裡面有更多「支持台獨」的聲音,這樣不但可以利用僑委會的資源在海外推廣我們的理念,還可以更進一步把它改名為「台僑委員會」。這樣的「接收」方式,遠比「廢除」還要輕鬆、容易得多。

唉!這個話題,我以前在 email list 上跟幾位台獨的前輩(如 Sebo 等)有過很熱烈的「辯論」,到最後真的是講到無力了。海外台獨人士如果不能跟著時代的演變調整步伐,不知道「改變手段」、「利用機會」走「最近的路」,那大概只有當「永遠的游擊隊」的份。

最後,我想跟各位說聲抱歉,因為有些用詞口氣可能過於強烈,這是因為憂心,希望不會被當成是一種冒犯。

10/18/2001

■ Why Taiwan is Important to USA

0 comments

———————————
This is a letter in response to reader comments about a program “DANGEROUS STRAITS” by PBS:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/china/

Reader forum:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/china/talk/
———————————

Dear FRONTLINE,

Several readers pointed out that the U.S. should not risk American lives to protect Taiwan against China. Indeed, why would, or should, America “spill her blood” on other people’s land for something that “seems to be” none of America’s business ?

What is so puzzling is that, for the past several decades, the U.S. government DID maintain an attitude that is/was opposite of that sentiment. Why ??? Is it that the American government has been so wrong for so many years, yet no one within the government has ever tried to fix it ? Or is there something missing in the above-mentioned mindset ?

Why should America protect Taiwan anyway ??? Is Taiwan’s “being free from from China” really none of American’s business ???

This brings us to one very crucial point which was missing, intentionally or not, from the episode of “Dangerous Straits:” the strategic role of Taiwan in terms of her geographical location.

About 100 miles off China’s eastern shores, Taiwan is on the western edge of the Pacific Ocean. To Taiwan’s north lies Korea and Japan. To her south, the Philippines. Together with Korean, Japan and the Philippines, Taiwan is one of the indispensable elements of a strategically defensive front line which seperates red China and the Pacific Ocean. If Taiwan falls into China’s hand, the entire Pacific Ocean will be wide open to China. This means that the American people will be face-to-face with red China across the Pacific Ocean. The U.S. and China will be staring at each other across the great expanse of the Pacific without any large in-between islands or land mass which the U.S. can claim as an ally.

Why does it matter? In the event of a crisis in eastern Asia, military or otherwise, the lack of islands that can be considered an ally to America may pose significant and serious logistical issues if the U.S. were to mass troops and other equipment for any contingency missions into or around China. One prime example is the current war in Afghanistan where the U.S. has had to use considerable diplomatic leverage in persuading the likes of Uzbekistan and Pakistan for the use of their facilities.

The strategic role that Taiwan plays has been so crucial that it has actually dictated, conscious or otherwise, the American’s policy toward Taiwan for half a century.

As for the argument that “face-to-face with China, so what?”, it depends on if you trust the Chinese government. Being a Taiwanese, I won’t. We have suffered enough.

9/16/2001

【Simple World】

0 comments

Strolling along the path of life
the care, the love, the passion
the sense, the shapes, the emotion
the events, the words, the history …
finally all getting to fade away
What have left behind —
A simple realization
for the beauty
the richness
the freedom
of the pure, simple
Vivid Worlds

7/18/2001

【左手小指】

0 comments

Drawing by my wife Shirley

是夕陽
是海風
是纖細多情的雙魚

左手的小指
就這樣輕輕地
把一生的感動
輕輕地
輕輕地按住 …

———————–
《古典吉他手記》– 7/18/01 –


2/27/1999

【一千零一夜】

0 comments


一千零一夜
送出一千零一個 Messages
感懷一千零一個世代裡的
一千零一段情事…

── 記憶是不是在冬眠
往事是不是已淡忘
迷途是不是成宿命
情愛的追尋
是不是永不止息?

敏感的浪子的心呀
深深蝕刻在一千零一個往生裡…

2/14/1999

【照影】

0 comments


— To a girl who reaches me in so many aspects of my life —

妳從節日的祝福中走來
帶著一種熟悉的神色--

春日的花顏
還有纖細的情愫
也是古早就存在的嗎?

而妳只是悄然的
用詩詞,用畫筆,
用一切我曾熟知的
細細重述那演化之前
一幅幅共振的歷史

於是我看見自己的影子
帶著節日的祝福緩緩走來
笑傲江湖的豪氣裡
我看見一顆溫暖善良的心
當然還有那頑皮與慧黠--

「就像這樣--
浪漫的但是要準確
超格的但是要真實…」

呵!原來就是這種熟悉--
那一切撼動著妳心靈的
也正同樣感動著我
同樣的頻率
同樣的心情…

於是--
在千里的迴音之間
古早的一盞燈精確地點亮
沉睡的熟悉於是復甦
在一度迷失的影子裡

— 2/14/1999 —

9/10/1998

【Holed Fence】

0 comments

Once upon a time he was a nice guy
A guy who thought he had good idea to share
To share with uncontrollable generosity

Yet for so many times his friends were hurt
Again and again, though unintentionally
Thirty-six years that he took to realize
"A verbal wound is as bad as a physical one"
That the holes he punched will never seal
The hearts, never heal

Yet "the fensce will never be the same"
The roses all fallen and friends all gone
The only thing that had left ---
A fence with many holes

--- 9/10/1998 ---